Investors Price 'US Risk' as American Exceptionalism Fades

Investors Price 'US Risk' as American Exceptionalism Fades

Financial Times 2 min read Intermediate
For the first time in recent memory, institutional and retail investors alike are explicitly pricing what they call “US risk” into their portfolios. The phrase captures a growing assessment that the United States can no longer be treated as a perpetual safe haven insulated from political, fiscal and structural challenges. What was once framed as American exceptionalism — superior growth, deep capital markets and policy reliability — is being re-evaluated amid a confluence of headwinds.

Market participants point to several drivers. Political polarization and policy uncertainty add a risk premium for markets that had previously assumed steady governance. Large fiscal deficits and a rising stock of public debt complicate long-term growth forecasts and increase sensitivity to shifts in interest-rate expectations. Elevated equity valuations, concentrated market leadership among a handful of technology giants, and questions around regulatory intervention have amplified the chance of sharper drawdowns in US assets.

Monetary policy also figures prominently. The Federal Reserve’s actions to tame inflation have produced a higher-for-longer rate backdrop than many investors anticipated; even modest signs of stubborn inflation or unexpected economic weakness can prompt rapid re-pricing across risk assets. In fixed income, the appeal of US Treasuries persists but is increasingly weighed against inflation uncertainty and real-yield dynamics.

Geopolitics and supply-chain realignments are another component of US-specific risk. Trade frictions, technology decoupling and export controls can disproportionately affect sectors with concentrated US exposure. Corporate leverage, especially in lower-rated credits, raises concerns about resilience should growth slow.

The practical consequence is a migration in allocation thinking. Portfolio managers report expanding non-US equity exposures, reassessing currency hedges and boosting allocations to commodities, real assets and selective emerging-market opportunities. Tactical use of protective options, increased cash buffers and shorter-duration bond positioning are also more common.

This does not mean a wholesale abandonment of US markets: depth, liquidity and innovation remain advantages. But investors are treating the US as one of several risk centers rather than the default anchor. That shift — cautious, incremental and data-driven — underscores a new era in which the perception of American exceptionalism is no longer guaranteed and must be actively weighed in investment decisions.